[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior
From: |
Larry Kollar |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 23:30:47 -0500 |
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>What about
>
> groff -stp -mm -Tps -X somefile.mm
>
>This gives linebreaks as in PS output.
Same results as groff -stp -mm -X somefile i.e. the output
gets trashed pretty badly. That makes sense, as -Tps is the
default. I guess I'll stick to ghostview for now.
>I'm also maintaining groff.texinfo (but currently have no time to
>improve it).
Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.
>> Is anyone trying to convert it to groff? (It seems a bit strange
>> that one would write a groff manual in texedit.)
>
>You mean texinfo, don't you?
What you said. It was late & I was in a hurry. :-P
>Well, *all* documentation for GNU programs should be in texinfo
>format (this was a religious decision, I think).
Hmmm. Call me an unwashed heathen, and leave it at that.
Troff I know, or can easily re-learn, and I'm a firm
believer in eating your own dog food.
>IIRC, someone has even written a texinfo to groff converter...
That would be texi2roff, no? Groff to texinfo would be good --
maintain the groff info in the format that it deserves, and
convert it to make the FSF happy. :-)
Thanks for the help!
Larry
- [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior, Larry Kollar, 2001/02/09
- Re: [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/02/09
- Re: [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior,
Larry Kollar <=
- Re: [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/02/10
- Re: [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior, Larry Kollar, 2001/02/12
- Re: [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/02/12
- [Groff] Strange gxditview behavior - FIX, Larry Kollar, 2001/02/13
- [Groff] Re: Strange gxditview behavior - FIX, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/02/14