[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:44:33 +0000 |
Hi Bernd,
> Maybe the documentation of .R should just removed from groff_man(7).
> That's not too great a loss because the funtionality of .R can be
> achieved by calling .RI with a single argument:
>
> .RI "This is all in roman font."
We can't change all the existing man pages though, or am I missing the
point?
% g '^\.R ' mkisofs.8
.R \-magic
Cheers,
Ralph.
- [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Bernd Warken, 2001/12/11
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Colin Watson, 2001/12/11
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/12
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/12
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Colin Watson, 2001/12/12
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/12/12
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/12
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Clarke Echols, 2001/12/11