[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac
From: |
Tadziu Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:00:41 +0100 |
> .TP
> .B \-hfs
> Create an ISO9660/HFS hybrid CD. This option should be used in
> conjunction
> with the
> .BR \-map ,
> .R \-magic
> and/or the various
> .I double dash
> options given below.
If I read this correctly, the ".R" should have been a ".B" anyway.
On the "roman" vs. "registered" issue, I nevertheless think
it is better to have a "roman" for reasons of consistency
than a "registered" (despite the latter being the AT&T way,
and me thus screwing up the existing manpages). Otherwise
I'd feel pressured to analogously implement a "copyright",
and I'd much rather have the ".C" reserved for a "computer"
font like in the HP manpage macros.
- [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Bernd Warken, 2001/12/11
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/12/11
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Colin Watson, 2001/12/11
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/12
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/12
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Colin Watson, 2001/12/12
- Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/12/12
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/12
Re: [Groff] inconsistency between .R and \*R in man.tmac, Clarke Echols, 2001/12/11