|
From: | Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: | Re: [Groff] Rendering \(oq in ASCII and ISO 8859-1 |
Date: | Sun, 23 Dec 2001 02:05:25 +0100 (CET) |
> > What exactly is a `shame'? > > Quotes being displayed like this: > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cjwatson/groff-quotes.png I must say that fonts which have such `quotes' really force the user to use Unicode. From a typographical point of view I fully agree that it is ugly. But 'foo' as a substitute for `foo' is simply not acceptable to me in many situations. For example, think of a man page documenting Lisp. `(...) and '(...) are completely different things. Werner
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |