Re: [Groff] on type bool

[Bernd Warken]

On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:11:44PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > 
> > IMHO having `bool' is the first step to have stable classes for 
> > implementing Unicode.
> 
> Please explain.  For me, those things are completely unrelated.  [Note
> that I don't oppose to your proposed changes, but my time constraints
> are quite severe.]
> 
The `bool' stuff is not pressing.  But the additions do not have any
impact on existing code.  You can just add it without having to check 
it or just leave for later on.  

Maybe it is better to wait for the next release.

Sorry for insulting people with improvements :-)

Bernd Warken