[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: groff + mp
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: groff + mp |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:38:07 +0100 (CET) |
> But the similar routine in dvips has
>
> { 1 index /FID ne 2 index /UniqueID ne and
> {def} {pop pop} ifelse } forall
>
> Did you consider that UniqueID issue?
No -- the RE macro in groff is Clark's original code. Until now there
were never any complaints, but it is probably an enhancement to use
the code from dvips. Opinions?
Werner
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, (continued)
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/10
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/10
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/21
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/21
- Re: [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Larry Kollar, 2006/02/24
- Message not available
- Fwd: [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Pedro A. López-Valencia, 2006/02/21
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/10
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/11
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/13
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/13
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14