[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: groff + mp
From: |
Michail Vidiassov |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: groff + mp |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:14:22 +0300 (MSK) |
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I want us to try to push groff support into the next metapost
version.
What do you want the MetaPost people do?
Among other things, I want them to change documentation, reflecting
the fact that groff is the version of troff in use.
If you take a look at (tex)info docs for metapost,
you will see references to dpost program, ditroff program and file format.
I am not sure what are the exact groff equivalents of the above.
(I am going to) jettison the remnants of the support for Ma Bell troff.
I think there are good chances that such patches are applied to the
MetaPost source files.
BTW. I think the latter support was broken netertheless. Can you
check?)
I can't. I don't have an old troff running.
What is the real state of the troff land?
What are the other players beyond groff?
Sincerely, Michail
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/03
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/10
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/11
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/13
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/13