[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Unformatted diversion?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Unformatted diversion? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:02:41 +0100 (CET) |
> Is there a way to define a diversion that just works raw?
If you define a macro, you get something unformatted.
> If the above is possible, then is it possible too that my macro
> seeing a parameter can decide that this must be a file name or the
> name of a macro (that contains my raw material)?
Please provide a real-case example, this is, please show what you want
to input and what you expect as output. This makes it much easier for
me to think about a solution.
Werner