groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Google+


From: James K. Lowden
Subject: Re: [Groff] Google+
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:01:40 -0400

On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:02:59 -0400
Peter Schaffter <address@hidden> wrote:

> It is true that the signal-to-noise ratio on the list is zero, which
> might not be the case with Google+.

Surely you mean "approaches 1", not 0?  Not that I'm helping....

--jkl





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]