[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:29:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.7.6-15-gc1887ab |
Hello Ralph,
Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden> wrote:
|Without suggesting any of this is a good idea... :-)
It'd be brilliant if it were 1984. Yes.
|> I'd also look into less(1) and write a proof-of-concept patch.
|> (Again, the idea is to have a simple command shortcut, say, ^X, read
|> in a decimal number, expand that to a backspace sequence and start a
|> simple search.)
|
|You may want to look into less's `tags' support, including the
|LESSGLOBALTAGS environment variable.
Well let's see how we can get it into less(1). Maybe the tag
support is a way, especially overloading [tT] for jumping along
several .Ix anchor manifestations.
Thanks Ralph.
--steffen
- [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/11
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/11
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/12
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/12
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/13
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/13
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Deri James, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/09/16
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/23