[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:58:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.7.6-15-gc1887ab |
Hallo Ingo, Ralph,
Ingo Schwarze <address@hidden> wrote:
|Ralph Corderoy wrote on Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:02:36PM +0100:
|
|> You may want to look into less's `tags' support, including the
|> LESSGLOBALTAGS environment variable.
|
|I fear that may be the wrong tool for the job. This is all about
|local jumping within one single page, while global(1) is all about
|That said, maybe you are right there are some similarities of the
|task, so comparing concepts and code may help to get the design
|right.
There may well be multiple .Ix referring to the same tag, so then
t|T could be overloaded to jump to the next / last. (At least
possibly that is.)
Also it would make sense to create a mark before an .Ix is
followed, so that '' (or a new '< or whatever) can be used to jump
back to where the user was before she followed the reference.
--steffen
- [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/11
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/11
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/12
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/12
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/13
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/13
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Deri James, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/15
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/09/16
- Re: [Groff] More referenceability for -mdoc would be an improvement!?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2014/09/23