[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?
From: |
deri |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2018 18:33:58 +0100 |
On Monday, 16 April 2018 00:14:05 BST Nate Bargmann wrote:
> Thanks, Ingo, for that very informative reply.
>
> I did just start reading the mdoc man page after sending that mail.
> Thanks for the additional resources. I shall check them out as I
> continue on with this aspect of the project.
>
> - Nate
i have been looking at merging the groff.texi file and various groff man pages
into one compendium pdf. The program which does the merging is still rather
beta, and probably would have problems with other texinfo files, but you can
view an example of the current state at:-
http://chuzzlewit.co.uk/groff_book.pdf
Chapter 6 (Preprocessors) is largely man pages. The pdf is built using groff.
Is this the sort of thing you were envisaging.
I am currently on holiday so minimal email.
Cheers
Deri
- [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Nate Bargmann, 2018/04/15
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/15
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Nate Bargmann, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, James K. Lowden, 2018/04/19
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/19
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, James K. Lowden, 2018/04/19
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Nate Bargmann, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, James K. Lowden, 2018/04/21