[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Apr 2018 18:55:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.9.10-15-g028e8634 |
Nate Bargmann <address@hidden> wrote:
|* On 2018 19 Apr 18:47 -0500, James K. Lowden wrote:
|> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 01:44:06 +1000
|> John Gardner <address@hidden> wrote:
...
|I, for one, do not expect an HTML rendered version of *anything* to
|be a faithful representation of a printed page. The output of
|"groff -man -Thtml ..." is reasonable for my purposes, except that I'd
|like to be able to generate relative links in a page to other pages in
|my project. Maybe I just need to do some sed(1) transformation after
|groff is done.
I have for example
. el .ie 'html'\*[.T]' \
. mx:dump-init-html
[...]
.de mx:dump-init-html
. \" grohtml is real shit..
. mso html.tmac
[get HTML macros]
. als mx:dump-xr mx:dump-xr-html
. als mx:dump-anchor mx:dump-anchor-html
. als mx:dump-ref mx:dump-ref-html
..
.
.de mx:dump-xr-html
. \" Cannot help it
..
.
.de mx:dump-anchor-html
. TAG "\$2"
. if d mx-debug \
. HTML <small>#\$2#</small>
..
.
.de mx:dump-ref-html
. URL "#\$1" "[\$1]"
[create an active reference]
..
I have to excuse myself for the strong wording.
|Note that I am only working with Groff's man macro package and do
|understand that other macro packages may have greater demands on the
|HTML generator.
I really want to excuse my strong wording.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, (continued)
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Nate Bargmann, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, James K. Lowden, 2018/04/19
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/19
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, James K. Lowden, 2018/04/19
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Nate Bargmann, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, James K. Lowden, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/22
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Deri James, 2018/04/22
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Larry Kollar, 2018/04/20
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/19
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Larry Kollar, 2018/04/20
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/20
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/20
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/20
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/20