groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?


From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 22:48:43 +0100

Hi,

Ingo wrote:
> The name of that standard section in man(7) and mdoc(7) is "EXIT
> STATUS", not "Exit Status" nor "Exit status" nor "exit status".

The shouting section heading makes it easier to find that heading rather
than the same word occurring elsewhere, e.g. `ENVIRONMENT'.
And if the .SH's parameter isn't shouting then perhaps there's a reason
for it and it should be preserved, even if it just shows up the bug to
fix.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]