[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?
From: |
John Gardner |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Apr 2018 07:54:59 +1000 |
>
> Begging your pardon ... who's pdfmark macros?
>
Ahaha, my bad. I recall well the credit Deri gave in pdf.tmac:
> *Much of the code in this macro has come from the excellent original work
> by*
> *Keith Marshall (see attribution in the pdfmark.tmac file). I, however,**am
> solely responsible for any bugs I may have introduced into this file*.
I apologise for my dimwittedness nonetheless...
@Ralph The shouting section heading makes it easier to find that heading
> rather
> than the same word occurring elsewhere, e.g. `ENVIRONMENT'.
> And if the .SH's parameter isn't shouting then perhaps there's a reason
> for it and it should be preserved, even if it just shows up the bug to
> fix.
They're still presented as such. CSS is used to stylise the capitalisation
so the heading assumes uppercase. The effect is a purely presentational one
to readers, but one that can have an adverse effect on screen-readers and
other accessibility software which interpret ALLCAPS as a list of letters
to read back to the user, one by one...
On 21 April 2018 at 07:43, Keith Marshall <address@hidden>
wrote:
> On 20/04/18 19:19, John Gardner wrote:
> > And as if that weren't enough, the renderer includes first-class
> > support for Deri Jame's pdfmark macros ...
>
> Begging your pardon ... who's pdfmark macros?
>
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, (continued)
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Steve Izma, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Mike Bianchi, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Steve Izma, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/26
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/25
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Larry Kollar, 2018/04/21
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/22
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/22
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Keith Marshall, 2018/04/20
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?,
John Gardner <=
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, G. Branden Robinson, 2018/04/21
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ingo Schwarze, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, John Gardner, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/16
- Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, G. Branden Robinson, 2018/04/21
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/04/16
Re: [groff] groff as the basis for comprehensive documentation?, Larry Kollar, 2018/04/18