[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark
From: |
Deri |
Subject: |
Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:49:39 +0000 |
On Monday, 17 February 2020 13:32:36 GMT Dave Kemper wrote:
> Considering that groff's own documentation is (perversely? ironically?
> choose your own adverb) written in Texinfo format, a discussion of the
> merits of that format could be considered on topic here (if a bit
> academic, since no one is champing at the bit to port groff's manual
> to any other format).
Well! A couple of years ago I had a go!
I wrote a script which converted the info, ms, and man formats to a file you
can run through groff
with the ms macro. The result is here:-
http://chuzzlewit.co.uk/groff_book.pdf
Not sure there is any real benefit, just the satisfaction of knowing groff can
produce its own
documentation!
Cheers
Deri
- Re: [groff] An alternative to info(1) ?, (continued)
- Re: [groff] An alternative to info(1) ?, Ulrich Lauther, 2020/02/17
- Re: [groff] An alternative to info(1) ?, Jan Stary, 2020/02/17
- Re: [groff] An alternative to info(1) ?, Nate Bargmann, 2020/02/17
- Re: An alternative to info(1) ?, Morten Bo Johansen, 2020/02/17
- Re: An alternative to info(1) ?, Nate Bargmann, 2020/02/17
- Re: [groff] An alternative to info(1) ?, Marc Chantreux, 2020/02/18
- Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/02/17
- Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark, John Gardner, 2020/02/17
- Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark, Colin Watson, 2020/02/17
- Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark, Dave Kemper, 2020/02/17
- Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark,
Deri <=
- Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark, Ingo Schwarze, 2020/02/18
- RE: man Macro Package and pdfmark, Jeff Conrad, 2020/02/16