[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?
From: |
Peter Schaffter |
Subject: |
Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"? |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Aug 2021 11:40:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?
>
> GNU refer doesn't. Neither did AT&T refer according to my searches.
The lacuna isn't in refer(1), but in the macro packages using it.
Any %c, where c is an alphabetic character, can be used to create
a field refer(1) understands. It is up to macro writers to work
out the the formatting and placement within a refer(1) citation or
bibliography entry.
--
Peter Schaffter
https://www.schaffter.ca
- Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, G. Branden Robinson, 2021/08/02
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Oliver Corff, 2021/08/02
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?,
Peter Schaffter <=
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Oliver Corff, 2021/08/02
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2021/08/02
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Peter Schaffter, 2021/08/02
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2021/08/02
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Peter Schaffter, 2021/08/02
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2021/08/03
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Peter Schaffter, 2021/08/03
- Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?, Dave Kemper, 2021/08/07
- Refer database fields (was: Re: Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?), Oliver Corff, 2021/08/07