[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some concern about the journal support
From: |
Javier Martín |
Subject: |
Re: Some concern about the journal support |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:14:21 +0200 |
El dom, 15-06-2008 a las 01:32 +0800, Bean escribió:
> >> How about a separate module?
> > It's a good idea, perhaps I can add a journal layer on top of disk to
> > do the mapping transparently.
> This patch revert ext2 and reiserfs driver to pre journal state. The
> new journal support would be in a separate module and provide a
> transparent mapping layer for the fs driver.
Just my two cents... AFAIK the journal part of ext3 and ext4 in
implemented quite in the same fashion: the "journaled block device" or
JBD acts as a black box to the filesystem, which works with it in a
database transaction-like fashion. I don't know how ReiserFS handles its
journal, but I think the same approach would work.
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, (continued)
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Pavel Roskin, 2008/06/13
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Robert Millan, 2008/06/14
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Bean, 2008/06/14
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Bean, 2008/06/14
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Robert Millan, 2008/06/14
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Bean, 2008/06/14
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Robert Millan, 2008/06/14
- Re: Some concern about the journal support,
Javier Martín <=
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Pavel Roskin, 2008/06/15
- Re: Some concern about the journal support, Bean, 2008/06/16