[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple partition maps
From: |
phcoder |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple partition maps |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 02:08:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) |
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:27:05PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:54:43PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
>>>> BTW GPT module checks the protective MBR. In some cases when legay OS
>>>> modified the MBR it's no longer "protective MBR". And in theese cases
>>>> GRUB will refuse to boot. Isn't the magic number check enough?
>>> If there's at least one protective GPT partition (0xee), I think this should
>>> be considered enough to accept the partmap as GPT.
>>>
>> In GPT module if first partition is not of type 0xee then it's
>> considered that no GPT is present. Is think that this check is
>> error-prone (with e.g. bootcamp) and unnecessary
>
> Agreed. Can you fix this?
>
OK.
- Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/03
- Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/04
- Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/04
- Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/04
- Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/08
- Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/08
- Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/08
- Re: Multiple partition maps,
phcoder <=
- [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/08
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/09
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/09
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/09