[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Sep 2008 17:01:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:16:26PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> I don't think that this is enough since with bootcamp you can have a MBR
> without a protective entry.
Then it looks like an MSDOS partition map to me. Is this a normal use case,
or something weird?
Also, what do others (e.g. Linux) do?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: Multiple partition maps, (continued)
- Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/04
- Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/04
- Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/08
- Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/08
- Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/08
- Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/08
- [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/08
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps, Robert Millan, 2008/09/09
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps, phcoder, 2008/09/09
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Multiple partition maps,
Robert Millan <=