[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 9/9] btrfs: Add RAID 6 recovery for a btrfs filesystem.
From: |
Daniel Kiper |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 9/9] btrfs: Add RAID 6 recovery for a btrfs filesystem. |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:23:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 08:51:03PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> From: Goffredo Baroncelli <address@hidden>
>
> Add the RAID 6 recovery, in order to use a RAID 6 filesystem even if some
> disks (up to two) are missing. This code use the md RAID 6 code already
> present in grub.
>
> Signed-off-by: Goffredo Baroncelli <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <address@hidden>
> ---
> grub-core/fs/btrfs.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
> index d066d54cc..d20ee09e4 100644
> --- a/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
> +++ b/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <grub/i18n.h>
> #include <grub/btrfs.h>
> #include <grub/crypto.h>
> +#include <grub/diskfilter.h>
>
> GRUB_MOD_LICENSE ("GPLv3+");
>
> @@ -702,11 +703,36 @@ rebuild_raid5 (char *dest, struct raid56_buffer
> *buffers,
> }
> }
>
> +static grub_err_t
> +raid6_recover_read_buffer (void *data, int disk_nr,
> + grub_uint64_t addr __attribute__ ((unused)),
> + void *dest, grub_size_t size)
> +{
> + struct raid56_buffer *buffers = data;
> +
> + if (!buffers[disk_nr].data_is_valid)
> + return grub_errno = GRUB_ERR_READ_ERROR;
> +
> + grub_memcpy(dest, buffers[disk_nr].buf, size);
> +
> + return grub_errno = GRUB_ERR_NONE;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +rebuild_raid6 (struct raid56_buffer *buffers, grub_uint64_t nstripes,
> + grub_uint64_t csize, grub_uint64_t parities_pos, void *dest,
> + grub_uint64_t stripen)
> +
> +{
> + grub_raid6_recover_gen (buffers, nstripes, stripen, parities_pos,
> + dest, 0, csize, 0, raid6_recover_read_buffer);
> +}
> +
> static grub_err_t
> raid56_read_retry (struct grub_btrfs_data *data,
> struct grub_btrfs_chunk_item *chunk,
> - grub_uint64_t stripe_offset,
> - grub_uint64_t csize, void *buf)
> + grub_uint64_t stripe_offset, grub_uint64_t stripen,
> + grub_uint64_t csize, void *buf, grub_uint64_t parities_pos)
> {
> struct raid56_buffer *buffers;
> grub_uint64_t nstripes = grub_le_to_cpu16 (chunk->nstripes);
> @@ -779,6 +805,15 @@ raid56_read_retry (struct grub_btrfs_data *data,
> ret = GRUB_ERR_READ_ERROR;
> goto cleanup;
> }
> + else if (failed_devices > 2 && (chunk_type & GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6))
> + {
> + grub_dprintf ("btrfs",
> + "not enough disks for raid6: total %" PRIuGRUB_UINT64_T
s/not enough disks for raid6/not enough disks for RAID 6/
You are using "RAID 5" in earlier patch, so, please be consistent
and use "RAID 6" here.
> + ", missing %" PRIuGRUB_UINT64_T "\n",
> + nstripes, failed_devices);
> + ret = GRUB_ERR_READ_ERROR;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> else
> grub_dprintf ("btrfs",
> "enough disks for RAID 5 rebuilding: total %"
> @@ -789,7 +824,7 @@ raid56_read_retry (struct grub_btrfs_data *data,
> if (chunk_type & GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5)
> rebuild_raid5 (buf, buffers, nstripes, csize);
> else
> - grub_dprintf ("btrfs", "called rebuild_raid6(), NOT IMPLEMENTED\n");
> + rebuild_raid6 (buffers, nstripes, csize, parities_pos, buf, stripen);
>
> ret = GRUB_ERR_NONE;
> cleanup:
> @@ -879,9 +914,11 @@ grub_btrfs_read_logical (struct grub_btrfs_data *data,
> grub_disk_addr_t addr,
> unsigned redundancy = 1;
> unsigned i, j;
> int is_raid56;
> + grub_uint64_t parities_pos = 0;
>
> - is_raid56 = !!(grub_le_to_cpu64 (chunk->type) &
> - GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5);
> + is_raid56 = !!(grub_le_to_cpu64 (chunk->type) &
> + (GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID5 |
> + GRUB_BTRFS_CHUNK_TYPE_RAID6));
>
> if (grub_le_to_cpu64 (chunk->size) <= off)
> {
> @@ -1030,6 +1067,17 @@ grub_btrfs_read_logical (struct grub_btrfs_data *data,
> grub_disk_addr_t addr,
> */
> grub_divmod64 (high + stripen, nstripes, &stripen);
>
> + /*
> + * parities_pos is equal to "(high - nparities) % nstripes"
> + * (see the diagram above).
> + * However "high - nparities" might be negative (eg when high
> + * == 0) leading to an incorrect computation.
However, "high - nparities" can be negative, eg. when high == 0,
leading to an incorrect results.
> + * Instead "high + nstripes - nparities" is always positive and
> + * in modulo nstripes is equal to "(high - nparities) % nstripes"
"high + nstripes - nparities" is always positive and modulo
nstripes is equal to "(high - nparities) % nstripes".
If you change above mentioned things you can retain my
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <address@hidden>
Daniel
- [PATCH 5/9] btrfs: Move logging code in grub_btrfs_read_logical(), (continued)
- [PATCH 5/9] btrfs: Move logging code in grub_btrfs_read_logical(), Goffredo Baroncelli, 2018/10/11
- [PATCH 1/9] btrfs: Add support for reading a filesystem with a RAID 5 or RAID 6 profile., Goffredo Baroncelli, 2018/10/11
- [PATCH 6/9] btrfs: Refactor the code that read from disk, Goffredo Baroncelli, 2018/10/11
- [PATCH 8/9] btrfs: Make more generic the code for RAID 6 rebuilding, Goffredo Baroncelli, 2018/10/11
- [PATCH 7/9] btrfs: Add support for recovery for a RAID 5 btrfs profiles., Goffredo Baroncelli, 2018/10/11
- [PATCH 9/9] btrfs: Add RAID 6 recovery for a btrfs filesystem., Goffredo Baroncelli, 2018/10/11
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] btrfs: Add RAID 6 recovery for a btrfs filesystem.,
Daniel Kiper <=