[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE FAQ
From: |
Matthew R Wette |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE FAQ |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 06:28:06 -0800 |
pax! writes ...
> Nathan Lovell writes:
> > Why use Guile instead of TCL or Perl or some other well-known, mature, and
> > well documented scripting language?
I have been doing Perl and TCL hacking for a long time. I found that
Guile is more productive in the code-run-debug-recode cycle when using
emacs.
> I could say more: why use Guile instead other scheme
> environments? I've been looking for a complete scheme development
> environment, and I thought Guile could meet all my requirementes. But
> the time passes, and I can't see more documentation, news, specs,
> releases... so I'm starting to think that should use somethink like
> scsh for my shell programming and mzscheme for developping and making my
> programs extensible.
>
> I think that guile developers are working hard, I've heard a lot of
> interesting things in this list, but I can't see any results out of
> here, and the worst thing is that _nobody_ out of here hears nothing.
>
> Don't you think that the "release often, release early" method should
> be used here?
There is documentation in the CVS repository (guile-doc).
- Re: GUILE FAQ, (continued)
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Peter C. Norton, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Bill Gribble, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Chris Cramer, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, pax!, 2001/01/23
Re: GUILE FAQ,
Matthew R Wette <=