[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?
From: |
Alejandro Forero Cuervo |
Subject: |
Re: why doesn't gimp use guile? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:14:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
when people install GNU software, it tends to start w/ gzip or bash, so
why doesn't someone extend one of them using guile? do the maintainers
reject such contributions?
How could you improve Bash or Gzip using Guile where the new features
outweight the cost of depending on Guile?
Keep in mind that Bash's and Gzip's sizes are about 1.8m and 0.2m
respectively and you'd make them depend on a 2.9m package (I'm taking
the sizes from the source code tarballs, the installed sizes probably
vary but these numbers should give an idea).
If I was the maintainer the new features would have to be very important
for me to be willing to accept them (unless, of course, they were
completely optional: usable if Guile is installed and unharmful bloat
when it is not).
And then, if the contributions are entirely optional, what have
we achieved? Will the distributors bundle their default shell/gzip
depending on Guile?
Don't get the idea that I want to stop Guile from becomming
widespread: I'd like that very much. I'm just trying to think like
those maintainers/distributors probably do. :)
when i read my old code, i find it pleasant when it is either scheme
or elisp, sort of so-so w/ sh and C, out of sorts w/ perl and
python, and wretched and tormented w/ C++. ymmv of course.
Wow, this is a very interesting thought: the quality of a programming
language is measured by how pleasant one finds one's own code on it one
year later. :)
Thanks.
Alejo, who is already late for his abstract algebra class.
http://bachue.com/alejo
--
The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution.
-- Albert Einstein.
$0='!/sfldbi!yjoV0msfQ!sfiupob!utvK'x44;print map{("\e[7m \e[0m",chr ord
(chop$0)-1)[$_].("\n")[++$i%77]}split//,unpack'B*',pack'H*',($F='F'x19).
"F0F3E0607879CC1E0F0F339F3FF399C666733333CCF87F99E6133999999E67CFFCCF3".
"219CC1CCC033E7E660198CCE4E66798303873CCE60F3387$F"#Don't you love Perl?
pgpSGF71DYt_b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- why doesn't gimp use guile?, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2002/02/14
- Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, Jeff Read, 2002/02/14
- Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, MJ Ray, 2002/02/14
- Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2002/02/14
- Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, MJ Ray, 2002/02/17
- Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2002/02/25
- Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, Per Bothner, 2002/02/25
- Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, Ken Anderson, 2002/02/19
Re: why doesn't gimp use guile?, Christopher Cramer, 2002/02/21