[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: LibreOffice
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: LibreOffice |
Date: |
Sun, 31 May 2015 22:32:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
> From what I understood, no. Libreoffice seems to expect the tarball in a
> special location, and the libreoffice build system takes care of unpacking it.
> But I am not a 100% sure whether the patching we do is needed or not;
> maybe everything would compile with the unchanged tarball. One of the problems
> is that the patching changes dates and causes an "autoreconf" (or similar)
> after unpacking anyway, so part of the /bin/sh-patching is reverted.
I think we should try hard to not make Libreoffice depend on
Autoconf/Automake; it’s always a good idea to avoid it, but even more so
here given the build time and size of the thing. :-)
Does that seem doable?
Thanks for the great progress on this!
Ludo’.