[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC NPM
|
From: |
Thompson, David |
|
Subject: |
Re: GSoC NPM |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:27:01 -0400 |
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Also, I found that you prefer going through the repository/github
> instead of using the dist tarball. Why is that?
The tarballs distributed by NPM are considered binaries, not source.
- Dave
- Re: GSoC NPM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/02
- Re: GSoC NPM,
Thompson, David <=
- Re: GSoC NPM, Jelle Licht, 2016/09/02
- Re: GSoC NPM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/04
- Re: GSoC NPM, Thompson, David, 2016/09/06
- NPM and trusted binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/09/06
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/07
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/07
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Jelle Licht, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/09/07