[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NPM and trusted binaries
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: NPM and trusted binaries |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:25:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Howdy,
Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:48:04AM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > * add --binary option to importer, sets (arguments (#:binary? #t))
>>
>> This violates a core principle of Guix: reproducible builds. I don't
>> support patches that encourage using pre-built binaries.
>
> In principle I agree. We want to be able to read the code.
>
> Still, I think Guix would benefit from a somewhat more relaxed stance
> in this.
It’s part of Guix’s mission to build from source whenever that is
possible, which is the case here, AIUI.
We know from previous discussions that some compilers can no longer be
built from source; we already have exceptions for these.
Ludo’.
- Re: GSoC NPM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/02
- Re: GSoC NPM, Thompson, David, 2016/09/02
- Re: GSoC NPM, Jelle Licht, 2016/09/02
- Re: GSoC NPM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/04
- Re: GSoC NPM, Thompson, David, 2016/09/06
- NPM and trusted binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/09/06
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/07
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Jelle Licht, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/09/07
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/09/08
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/09
- Re: NPM and trusted binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/09/09