[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0 |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Sep 2016 10:06:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 03:50:55PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> > When I put "openssl" in the 'name' field, as attached, `guix build
> > openssl` gives me 1.1.0, which is not right. The other *-next packages
> > all seem to use "name-next" as the name.
>
> Yes, but it’s different. Guile 2.1, for instance, is the development
> series, so it makes sense to give it a different name so users don’t end
> up using the “wrong” series.
>
> Conversely, IIUC, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is the new stable series, no?
1.1.0 is the new stable series, but I haven't found any software that
can use the new interface yet. So, I don't want to make 1.1.0 the
default OpenSSL version in Guix. Does that make sense?
> > Also, I wonder if this should inherit from openssl?
> >
> > Presumably there will be more security updates to address@hidden before
> > address@hidden is ready for general use, and I'd wouldn't like for
> > address@hidden updates to be delayed while we wait to see if
> > address@hidden still builds with the changes.
>
> Though OpenSSL builds in 5–10 minutes, so the extra check wouldn’t take
> so long, no?
I guess it will not matter for now, since nothing will be using it. When
it becomes widely used, we can revisit this question.
- [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/01
- [PATCH 1/1] gnu: openssl: Update to 1.1.0., Leo Famulari, 2016/09/01
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/06