[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0 |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Sep 2016 22:20:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 04:34:51PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Yes, but as long the ‘openssl’ refers to 1.0.x, it doesn’t really matter
> than the “openssl” package points to the latest one, no? Use can still
> run “guix package -i address@hidden if they want.
Oh, right :)
I've attached a patch for review.
0001-gnu-Add-openssl-next.patch
Description: Text document
- [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/01
- [PATCH 1/1] gnu: openssl: Update to 1.1.0., Leo Famulari, 2016/09/01
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/06