Re: Tracking package submissions with Debbugs

[Efraim Flashner]

On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:39:12PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Alex!
> 
> Alex Vong <address@hidden> skribis:
> 
> > While it may not be as user-friendly as web-based bug tracker these
> > days, I think the Debian bug tracking system is still better than our
> > current approach. In Debian, everything is a package. It is like a
> > language primitive in the bug tracker system.
> >
> >
> > There is an "intended to package" (ITP) package. When you want to
> > package something, you simply file a bug against the ITP package. This
> > has the advantage that, the relevant information stays within the bug
> > report. So everyone can see the whole process, starting from someone
> > intending to package, to a fully reviewed package, all in a single bug
> > report. It is like having "lexical scoping".
> 
> And we all like lexical scoping.  :-)

I think it would make sense to have the one bug report for the "target
package" and then all the packages that get pulled in along the way get
tacked on also.

> 
> > And the most important argument comes: We already have it now[0]! So,
> > this could be a working intermediate solution. Currently, we are not
> > using debbugs to its full potential.
> >
> >
> > My suggestion will be to create a new package called "guix-package", and
> > all people hoping to introduce a new package to guix should file a bug
> > report to <address@hidden>. If you are new to this type of bug
> > tracking system, no problem! There is (some) documentation on it[1][2]
> > and here is my own little example[3].
> 
> I think this is a good idea, at least an improvement over the status
> quo.
> 
> I suppose it wouldn’t handle patch series very well though, would it?
> Or people would have to send the “cover letter” of the series first, and
> then send the rest to address@hidden once a number has been
> assigned?
> 

This seems like the best idea, otherwise we'd have to reassign and merge
all the patches.

> What’s unclear to me is how convenient Debbugs is for non-Emacs users:
> Emacs has M-x debbugs-gnu, which is a significant UI improvement, but
> how do non-Emacs users deal with Debbugs?
> 

This is one of my concerns. There's reportbug (and reportbug-ng) in
Debian https://reportbug-ng.alioth.debian.org/index.html that we might
be able to use after forking/patching our info in for Debian's.

> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
> 

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature