[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debugging and source code
From: |
Danny Milosavljevic |
Subject: |
Re: Debugging and source code |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 21:41:09 +0100 |
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:22:48 +0100
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > Since we allow for debug symbols using :debug (great feature!),
Aha? Why's that not available in our icecat package? I have to find out how
it's done elsewhere and copy it :)
> You can always get the right source code by running “guix build -S
> package”.
>
> OTOH having the source directly in the “debug” (or “source”?) output as
> you suggest would be more convenient.
>
> The only downside is the extra size of the “debug” output. Most of the
> time that’s a price people are happy to pay when they are installing the
> “debug” output. But sometimes maybe not.
Ahhh that's a difficult call. I think it would be best if we collected some
statistics before we decided that. For example how big is the source code of a
package versus the binary? On average? Depending on the language? How many % of
the total size is the source code?
- Re: Debugging and source code, (continued)
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/25
- Re: Debugging and source code, Pjotr Prins, 2017/01/25
- Re: Debugging and source code, Chris Marusich, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Pjotr Prins, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Pjotr Prins, 2017/01/28
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/30
- Re: Debugging and source code, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/01/30
Re: Debugging and source code,
Danny Milosavljevic <=