[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Python 2 retirement — what should Guix do?
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: Python 2 retirement — what should Guix do? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:45:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 11:15:36PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Softening the policy to add “python2-” packages sounds like a good way
> to move forward. For new packages, it’s quite simply: just don’t
> provide the “python2-” variant unless it’s required. For existing
> packages, it seems trickier though. Which packages would we remove and
> when?
When they break and no one is interested in fixing. As long as there
is interest there will be fixers.
Pj.