Re: Re-approaching package tagging

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Christopher Lemmer Webber <address@hidden> skribis:

> I wonder for keywords that would be awkward to "force" into the
> description if we could have an "extra keywords" section?  Then we can
> skip tagging, but in case a package's description didn't comfortably fit
> that word, you can still find it by it.  Then it's not separate tagging,
> just extra words to find a package by that the description didn't say.

Good question.  I don’t think we’ve really had concerns about “extra
words” in the past (and the regexps are also matched against the file
name for instance, which can also help), but let’s keep that suggestion
in mind if that happens!

Ludo’.