[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status update on 1.0
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Status update on 1.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:47:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Timothy,
Timothy Sample <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
>> • GDM works well for GNOME and WMs that provide a .session file.
>> However it still doesn’t honor ~/.xsession. We discussed it before
>> and dropped the ball. Timothy, what’s missing? I’d really like to
>> make it the default.
>
> Nothing is missing! As promised [1], in the last patch series I made
> GDM run our custom “xinitrc” script instead of the built-in one. This
> happened in commit 41fa9f1815685ede0d3fdc1c561d2a9cf0ffb158. :)
>
> (I tested this now to be absolutely sure, and it works like a charm.)
Oh, awesome! I keep forgetting about all the good things that happen.
:-)
> Yes. We should be working on “guix size gnome-shell”. It more
> accurately reflects the size of GDM, and (I hope you’re sitting down) it
> weighs in at 2GiB!
>
> Fortunately, it looks like we could claw back ~400MiB by (somehow)
> dropping “hplip-minimal”. It gets pulled in through the path
>
> gdm → gnome-settings-daemon → colord → sane-backends →
> hplip-minimal.
>
> We almost certainly don’t need it for GDM. I guess removing it means
> making a version of “colord” without “sane-backends”. It was introduced
> in commit 4c9287432824f396d5c614c3b2287f553cd9fb90. I’ll look into
> this.
Cool! That’d already be an improvement.
> GNOME Shell has a handful of silly references like “inkscape” and
> “webkitgtk” that are huge and (I assume) unnecessary.
Oh indeed. Inkscape comes from
45fef894eb5b39029633cd0cd907e8ce8c5ab379, I’ll look into it.
> There seems to be a handful of easy wins. I would be surprised if we
> could get the closure of “gnome-shell” below 1GiB, but we will see.
> Also, keep in mind that a lot of these bytes will be recycled. For
> instance, GTK+ 3 is ~700MiB, and chances are there will be at least one
> GTK+ 3 application besides GDM.
Yes, sure.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: Status update on 1.0, (continued)
- Re: Status update on 1.0, mikadoZero, 2019/03/13
- Re: Status update on 1.0, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/03/13
- Re: Status update on 1.0, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/03/13
- Re: Status update on 1.0, L p R n d n, 2019/03/13
- Re: Status update on 1.0, L p R n d n, 2019/03/14
- Re: Status update on 1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/03/15
- Re: Status update on 1.0, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/03/15
- Re: Status update on 1.0, mikadoZero, 2019/03/13
Re: Status update on 1.0, Timothy Sample, 2019/03/14
Re: Status update on 1.0, Gábor Boskovits, 2019/03/14