[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tricking peer review
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Tricking peer review |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:39:12 +0200 |
Hi Ludo,
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 09:40, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> wrote:
> I don’t think there are “tragic” commits either. Usually, one records a
> revision that works for them and use the same months later.
Drifting from the initial comment. One could name “tragic” commits are
commits which break “guix pull”. It is rare these days but there are
some reachable ones via “guix time-machine”.
Cheers,
simon
- Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ryan Prior, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/18
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ryan Prior, 2021/10/18
- Re: Tricking peer review,
zimoun <=
- Re: Tricking peer review, Leo Famulari, 2021/10/20
- Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/21
Re: Tricking peer review, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2021/10/15
Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/18
Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19