[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tricking peer review
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: Tricking peer review |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Oct 2021 19:03:49 -0400 |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:39:12AM +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Drifting from the initial comment. One could name “tragic” commits are
> commits which break “guix pull”. It is rare these days but there are
> some reachable ones via “guix time-machine”.
That's a good point. Is it a good idea to teach Guix to help (not force)
users to avoid these commits?
- Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ryan Prior, 2021/10/15
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/18
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ryan Prior, 2021/10/18
- Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Re: Tricking peer review,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/21
Re: Tricking peer review, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2021/10/15
Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/18
Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19