[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-source version not honored?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: --with-source version not honored? |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:02:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Phil Beadling <phil@beadling.co.uk> skribis:
> I was able to write a short manifest that avoided the overwriting of the
> original "foobarpy" package in my case, and instead cleanly replace it with
> a newer version specified using "with-source".
>
> By setting, for example, GUIX_FOOBAR_VERSION=1.23 and
> GUIX_TEST_PACKAGE=my-package - I can now create an environment which builds
> the version of foobarpy I want from an https link generated from
> GUIX_FOOBAR_VERSION, and then create a modified version of "my-package"
> with foobarpy replaced, rather than overwritten.
Nice! For the record, there’s a ‘--with-latest’ option that I initially
intended to be ‘--with-version’, but the importer/updater code isn’t
capable enough yet.
> Anyway thought I'd share this here as a template for simple non-recursive
> cases. I suspect it's not a massive effort to make it recursive, when I
> have a moment I'll have a think about that too. Any thoughts on how to
> improve are welcome!
Thanks for sharing!
Ludo’.
- --with-source version not honored?, Phil Beadling, 2021/10/20
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, Julien Lepiller, 2021/10/20
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, zimoun, 2021/10/20
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, Phil, 2021/10/20
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, zimoun, 2021/10/21
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/21
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, zimoun, 2021/10/21
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, Phil, 2021/10/23
- Re: --with-source version not honored?, Phil Beadling, 2021/10/24
- Re: --with-source version not honored?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
Re: --with-source version not honored?, Phil, 2021/10/20