[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repology and outdated packages
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: Repology and outdated packages |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:02:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Maxime Devos schreef op di 07-06-2022 om 23:32 [+0200]:
> In my experience with antioxidant, not-up-to-date Rust toolchains do
> not prevent upgrading packages -- in the process of resolving build
> failures, I updated some crates. This never resulted in a ‘you need
> an
> new toolchain error’. At worst, I had to disable the "unstable",
> "nightly" or "generic-simd" features of the crate.
Correction (adding the rust-git-path crate to update another crate to
avoid non-building crate due to updated crates with a different API):
Saving crate informtion in
/gnu/store/fr292pqsfas2i9nwc3bijx5skb8g3ayg-rust-git-path-0.1.3/lib/guixcrate/git-path.crate-info
error[E0658]: use of unstable library feature 'is_symlink'
--> src/realpath.rs:50:34
|
50 | if real_path.is_symlink() {
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #85748 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85748>
for more information
Looks like it is possible to work-around avoid though:
https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/commit/c6745a3d7fcea3a949c3e13e682b8ddcbd213add
Alternatively, I could set RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1. From
<https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/building/bootstrapping.html>
The build system sets RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1. This special variable means
to break the stability guarantees of rust: Allow using #![feature(...)]
with a compiler that's not nightly. This should never be used except
when bootstrapping the compiler.
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Repology and outdated packages, kiasoc5, 2022/06/07
- Re: Repology and outdated packages, Nicolas Goaziou, 2022/06/07
- Re: Repology and outdated packages, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/07
- Re: Repology and outdated packages,
Maxime Devos <=
- Re: Repology and outdated packages, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/07
- Re: Repology and outdated packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/06/08
- Re: Repology and outdated packages, kiasoc5, 2022/06/08
- Re: Repology and outdated packages, kiasoc5, 2022/06/09