[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shall updaters fall back to other updaters?
|
From: |
Hartmut Goebel |
|
Subject: |
Re: Shall updaters fall back to other updaters? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jul 2022 14:33:04 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 |
Am 03.07.22 um 17:11 schrieb Kaelyn:
To me, this feels like the importers will need a more deterministic order
imposed on them to get import results that are consistent across systems. HTH!
Many thanks for your analysis.
Meanwhile it came to my mind that I actually have different
installations of guix which I can compare, Below are three
installations. each one has a different order (these are actually
different versions of guix with different importers/updaters, anyhow the
order should be the same):
stackage pypi opam minetest launchpad kde hexpm hackage gnome github
generic-git gem elpa egg crate bioconductor cran cpan savannah
generic-html gnu-ftp sourceforge xorg kernel.org gnu
stackage pypi opam minetest launchpad kde hackage gnome github
generic-git gem elpa egg crate cran bioconductor cpan kernel.org
sourceforge gnu generic-html gnu-ftp xorg savannah
stackage pypi opam minetest launchpad kde hackage gnome github
generic-git gem elpa egg crate bioconductor cran cpan sourceforge
generic-html gnu-ftp savannah xorg kernel.org gnu
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |