[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release progress, week 3
|
From: |
Vagrant Cascadian |
|
Subject: |
Re: Release progress, week 3 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:04:13 -0700 |
On 2022-10-27, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Release progress: week 3.
...
> • Architectures:
>
> - powerpc64le-linux builds are back behind ci.guix, thanks to
> Tobias!
...
> - armhf-linux: No progress so far.
Not sure where this fits into the release process, but I uploaded a git
snapshot to Debian of guix from commit
c07b55eb94f8cfa9d0f56cfd97a16f2f7d842652 ... ppc64le still has not built
yet, and it has the same test suite failures on two 32-bit architectures
(i386 and armhf):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guix&arch=armhf&ver=1.3.0%2B26756.c07b5-1&stamp=1666838910&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=guix&arch=i386&ver=1.3.0%2B26756.c07b5-1&stamp=1666825176&raw=0
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU Guix 1.3.0.26756-c07b5
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 2286
# PASS: 2002
# SKIP: 274
# XFAIL: 4
# FAIL: 6
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
All 6 of the failures have the same error:
test-name: channel-news, no news
...
actual-error:
+ (git-error
+ #<<git-error> code: -1 message: "invalid version 0 on git_proxy_options"
class: 3>)
result: FAIL
Would love to figure out these issues in time for release!
Good news is it built reproducibly (at least on amd64; i386, armhf and
arm64 pending):
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/guix.html
This is partly because the Debian package works around
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/20272 by disabling parallelism in the
build. Sure would be nice if guix was reproducible when built with Guix
too!
live well,
vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature