[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
From: |
Timothy Sample |
Subject: |
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jan 2024 10:59:24 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
>> Special remotes can also be written in other languages:
>>
>> https://git-annex.branchable.com/design/external_special_remote_protocol/
>
> Thanks! I did not know. Indeed, it could be a nice GSoC to implement
> some ‘git-annex-backend-nar’. :-)
I’ve written a special remote in Guile. If anyone wants to do so, the
following file might help. It implements the basic protocol.
https://git.ngyro.com/git-annex-remote-clouda/tree/git-annex-remote-clouda/remote.scm
More generally, I’m a fan of git-annex. The basic idea is both good and
simple: manage content-addressed, external references in a Git repo. My
biggest complaint is that the interface and its many features often
obscure this simplicity.
-- Tim
- Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?, (continued)
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?, pukkamustard, 2024/01/24
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?, Simon Tournier, 2024/01/25
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?, Philip McGrath, 2024/01/26
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?, Efraim Flashner, 2024/01/28