[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#27235: [PATCH] gnu: Add openscenegraph.
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
bug#27235: [PATCH] gnu: Add openscenegraph. |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:47:47 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Manolis Ragkousis (2017-06-07 09:29 +0300) wrote:
> Hey Alex,
Hi!
> On 06/06/17 22:59, Alex Kost wrote:
>> address@hidden (2017-06-04 17:57 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> +(define-public openscenegraph
>>> + (package
>>> + (name "openscenegraph")
>>> + (version "3.4.0")
>>> + (source (origin
>>> + (method url-fetch)
>>> + (uri (string-append
>>> "http://trac.openscenegraph.org/downloads/developer_releases/"
>>> + "OpenSceneGraph-" version ".zip"))
>>
>> Isn't this version old? I see 3.5.6 here:
>>
>> https://github.com/openscenegraph/OpenSceneGraph/releases
>
> I was following this [1] and chose 3.4.0.
>
> The github release is a developer version and according to [2]: "Our
> developer releases are made more regularily than our stable releases and
> are simply tags of the latest source code under version control. The
> developer releases do not under any dedicated testing prior to release
> and are meant to be snapshots of the latest development work that is
> going into the next stable release. The versioning for stable release is
> major.minor.patch where the minor release is odd number signifying that
> it's developer release."
>
> For this reason I think we should go with 3.4.0 for now.
Ah, OK, thanks for explaining! I failed to find this web page :-)
BTW, I see that you also packaged "unshield". Since unshield and
openscenegraph are the dependencies of "OpenMW", I wonder, is packaging
OpenMW your goal?
> [1] http://www.openscenegraph.org/index.php/download-section/stable-releases
> [2]
> http://www.openscenegraph.org/index.php/download-section/developer-releases
--
Alex