[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#37988] [PATCH 0/6] Add flowWorkspace from BioConductor
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
[bug#37988] [PATCH 0/6] Add flowWorkspace from BioConductor |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:23:24 +0100 |
Dear,
The aim of this serie is to add the package flowWorkspace.
It is important to notice that the package RProtobuflib [1] from BioConductor
is not packaged using the correct convention. RProtobuflib includes its
dependency protobuf-2.6.0 as an archive tgz and compiles it using its
./configure [2]. Therefore, the file ./configure from the unarchived
protobuf-2.6.0 needs to be patched to apply the correct shebang.
It is clearly unconventional and we should distribute our own version of
RProtobuflib using the correct way i.e., packaging protobuf-2.6.0. However,
do we want to diverge to the official BioConductor and add maintenance burden
when we are not fully able to already package all the BioConductor archive?
All the best,
simon
[1] https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/RProtoBufLib.html
[2] https://github.com/RGLab/RProtoBufLib/blob/trunk/configure#L2860-L2889
zimoun (6):
gnu: Add r-idpmisc.
gnu: Add r-flowviz.
gnu: Add r-rprotobuflib.
gnu: Add r-cytolib.
gnu: Add r-ncdfflow.
gnu: Add r-flowworkspace.
gnu/packages/bioconductor.scm | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gnu/packages/cran.scm | 30 ++++++
2 files changed, 203 insertions(+)
--
2.23.0
- [bug#37988] [PATCH 0/6] Add flowWorkspace from BioConductor,
zimoun <=