[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script"
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script" |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:36:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Konrad Hinsen <address@hidden> skribis:
> From a user interface point of view, it is preferable to have many
> commands with clear names, rather than few commands overloaded with
> multiple functions selected by cryptic options.
I agree overall, though it’s not black and white: the benefit of having
separate commands weakens as they proliferate. A new command may be
more difficult to discover than an option to an existing command.
But anyway, let’s see how we can get ‘run-script’ in! :-)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Konrad Hinsen, 2020/04/01
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Ludovic Courtès, 2020/04/03
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Konrad Hinsen, 2020/04/07
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script",
Ludovic Courtès <=
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/17
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Konrad Hinsen, 2020/04/23
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/23
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Konrad Hinsen, 2020/04/29
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/30
[bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/02