[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script"
From: |
Konrad Hinsen |
Subject: |
[bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script" |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:12:59 +0200 |
Hi Simon,
> Why not simply add an option to "guix repl"?
> For example "--batch", mimicking "emacs --batch".
> Or "--script".
Do you have a suggestion for explaining such a command to someone who
want to run a script bu (1) doesn't know what a REPL is, (2) doesn't
need to know what a REPL is, (3) would be mystified by the behavior
resulting from forgetting the –script argument?
I agree of course that naming is hard, but it is also important. Git
should be a sufficient demonstration of what happens when you design
command-line interfaces by a sequence of cumulative least-effort
decisions.
Cheers,
Konrad
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", (continued)
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Ludovic Courtès, 2020/04/03
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Konrad Hinsen, 2020/04/07
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Ludovic Courtès, 2020/04/07
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/17
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script",
Konrad Hinsen <=
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/23
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", Konrad Hinsen, 2020/04/29
- [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/30
[bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script", zimoun, 2020/04/02