[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
[bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:46:11 +0100 |
Leo, Ellis,
Leo Prikler 写道:
I'd like to say "use your best judgement", but you seem to be a
little
too fixated on having a minimal package description (and putting
minimal effort into it).
That's uncalled for. It's certainly not the impression I get.
For instance, when the package advertises encryption, while it
is
technically optional, shipping it without gpg would be a grave
oversight!
Well, that depends. My own rule of thumb for ‘foo supports
encryption!’ is:
$ gpg
bash: gpg: command not found
$ foo --encrypt
error: whoopsie: BUG in do_foo()+0x4f44!
<16 lines of barftrace>
error: warning: error: No such file or directory. (-ERROR)
$
=> Make gpg an input, and quick.
$ gpg
bash: gpg: command not found
$ foo --encrypt
error: gpg not found, please install it.
$
=> This is totally fine, users who want it know what to do next.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Leo Prikler, 2021/02/01
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Ellis Kenyő, 2021/02/01
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Leo Prikler, 2021/02/01
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Ellis Kenyő, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Leo Prikler, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Ellis Kenyő, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Leo Prikler, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Ellis Kenyő, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <=
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Leo Prikler, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Ellis Kenyő, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Leo Prikler, 2021/02/06
- [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2021/02/06