|
From: | Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: | [bug#46784] [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. |
Date: | Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:05:54 +0100 |
Nicolas Goaziou 写道:
OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause BSD is not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about zero-bsd?
I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested ‘bsd-0’ to Alex :-) that accuracy is implied or valuable. Guix maps ‘n-clause-BSD’ to ‘bsd-n’, we get (marginally) fewer requests to add ‘missing’ licences, all is well with the world.
It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text; that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence. That requires claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is a... certain kind of correct.
Kind regards, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |