[bug#47182] [PATCH 00/18] Add support for powerpc64le-linux (wip-ppc64le-for-master)

[Chris Marusich]

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

>>        #:tests? ,(let ((s (or (%current-target-system)
>>                               (%current-system))))
>>                    (not (or (string-prefix? "aarch64" s)
>> -                           (string-prefix? "mips64" s))))
>> +                           (string-prefix? "mips64" s)
>> +                           (string-prefix? "powerpc64le" s))))
>> +
>
> we can probably change this to use cute in core-updates. I don't know if
> changing it here will cause rebuilds on aarch64.

The result of unquoting the expression will be either #t or #f,
depending on the system.  For an aarch64 system, the string s hasn't
changed (it'll still start with "aarch64", right?).  Therefore, my
understanding is that this change here will not alter the package
definition; it will still say "#:tests? #f", just like it did before, on
an aarch64 system.  Is there something else I'm missing?

-- 
Chris