gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/UMLLink SCRATCH


From: Toni Alatalo
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/UMLLink SCRATCH
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 04:13:18 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Toni Alatalo <address@hidden>   03/01/22 04:13:18

Modified files:
        UMLLink        : SCRATCH 

Log message:
        a(n irrelevant?) note about the duplication that occurs in this 
temporary system

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/UMLLink/SCRATCH.diff?tr1=1.4&tr2=1.5&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/UMLLink/SCRATCH
diff -u manuscripts/UMLLink/SCRATCH:1.4 manuscripts/UMLLink/SCRATCH:1.5
--- manuscripts/UMLLink/SCRATCH:1.4     Tue Jan 21 04:32:38 2003
+++ manuscripts/UMLLink/SCRATCH Wed Jan 22 04:13:18 2003
@@ -15,3 +15,14 @@
 "A model is a simplification of reality."
 "We build models so that we can better understand the system
 we are developing."
+
+
+Is the duplication of data an issue here? Even when the idea is that the
+UMLs are hand crafted, and not generated from the code at all, it might be a
+bad idea to duplicate the class names and relations in .umls and the source?
+A solution might be to be able to refer from .uml to the objects somehow.
+Obviously gzz connections would solve this and perhaps this is all clear to
+you, sorry to disturb if so, and clarifications are welcome. --antont
+(updata: re-read the article and saw the "this is a temporary system" note
+which refers to this, I guess? we did also discuss this on irc ones so i
+guess the issue is clear -- no need to reply and this can be removed at will)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]