gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst


From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 05:11:34 -0500

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden>      03/01/22 05:11:33

Modified files:
        storm          : article.rst 

Log message:
        bit

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/storm/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.29&tr2=1.30&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/storm/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.29 manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.30
--- manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.29  Wed Jan 22 03:30:46 2003
+++ manuscripts/storm/article.rst       Wed Jan 22 05:11:32 2003
@@ -5,6 +5,18 @@
 Introduction
 ============
 
+Many hypermedia systems place each document or link in the custody
+of one server, rendering it unusable when connectivity fails.
+For example, on the web, when connection to a server fails,
+links to documents on this server can generally not be followed.
+In Microcosm [ref], links are stored in *filters*, so when
+
+
+
+
+Stuff not yet located in the article :-)
+========================================
+
 (remove-at-will: There are two kinds of mobility related to hypermedia use:)
 
 In today's networked world, data moves freely between computers:
@@ -193,8 +205,21 @@
 
 Above is not a *correct* urn-5, but very similar to last part of notes' syntax.
 
+<<<<<<< article.rst
+benja's reply:
+Hm. Replication to me means, the same data is kept on multiple
+machines. This is not what we are talking about here: We're talking
+about *different versions* of the same data being kept
+on multiple machines, and occasionally being 'brought into sync'
+with each other. If I send you a draft article and you comment on it,
+and I make changes too, and later I merge the two divergent
+versions back together, 'syncing' seems approximately right,
+but 'replication' seems completely wrong to me.
+
+=======
 (Of course, this is very similar to 'normal' URLs, but our purpose here is to 
give an example
 of how one refer to a particular data item in colloboration-like tool, like 
Notes)
+>>>>>>> 1.28
 
 In Notes, there are servers, which maintain replication of data, opposite to 
Gzz. What is 
 interesting in Notes' replication, is the fact that the replication of 
database not only 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]