[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst

[Hermanni Hyytiälä]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Hermanni Hyytiälä <address@hidden>      03/01/29 05:12:59

Modified files:
        storm          : article.rst 

Log message:
        More p2p overview

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/storm/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.52&tr2=1.53&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/storm/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.52 manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.53
--- manuscripts/storm/article.rst:1.52  Wed Jan 29 04:28:59 2003
+++ manuscripts/storm/article.rst       Wed Jan 29 05:12:57 2003
@@ -333,18 +333,12 @@
 along the routing path.
 
 Of course, there are major differences within approaches. For DHT approach, 
-perhaps the biggest difference is *what* is self-organized into virtual key 
space. 
-For instance, in SWAN [ref] and Skip Graph [ref], *data items* self-organise 
-into  virtual address space, while in other DHT implementations *peers* 
-self-organise in structured form in virtual space. In broadcasting approach, 
-implementations' differences lie in the structural *level* of overlay network 
-(super peers, clusters).
-
-
-
-For our purposes, DHT seems to be the best choice.
-
-
+perhaps the biggest difference is the fact *what* is self-organized into 
+virtual key space. For instance, in SWAN [ref] and Skip Graph [ref], *data 
+items* self-organise into  virtual address space, while in other DHT 
+implementations *peers* self-organise in structured form in virtual space. 
+In broadcasting approach, implementations' differences mostly lie in the 
+*structural level* of overlay network, i.e. super peers and peer clusters.
 
 
 7. Experience and future directions